Marriage is a complicated question th...

/
0 Comments
Marriage is a complicated question that does nothing but comes out with a complicated answer. The debate on same-sex marriage is an extremely sensitive one. Most people acknowledge that marriage is an ancient institution that began with the beginning of mankind. It is uncommonly known that nobody really knows where the origin of marriage came from. One cannot assume that marriage came from religion, however, one can say that religion played a part in the idea of marriage. 

History confirms that government participated very little or none at all in the regulation of marriage. Most marriages, in most cultures, were done by mutual agreement. Yet, now, specifically in the United States, regulation of marriage is done by the US Government on a daily basis. 

Nerd in Denial breaks it down for us: 

First, let's address what marriage is in the United States. Marriage is a legal contract between to people (mostly commonly and historically between one man and one woman) to co-habitate and have children. There are a variety of government benefits that come along with being married. The biggest benefit of being married is probably the tax benefit. Other than that, the rest of the benefits are legal conveniences such as:

- joint parenting;
- joint adoption;
- joint foster care, custody, and visitation (including non-biological parents);
status as next-of-kin for hospital visits and medical decisions where one partner is too ill to be competent;
- joint insurance policies for home, auto and health;
- dissolution and divorce protections such as community property and child support;
- immigration and residency for partners from other countries;
- inheritance automatically in the absence of a will;
- joint leases with automatic renewal rights in the event one partner dies or leaves the house or apartment;
- inheritance of jointly-owned real and personal property through the right of survivorship (which avoids the time and expense and taxes in probate);
- benefits such as annuities, pension plans, Social Security, and Medicare;
- spousal exemptions to property tax increases upon the death of one partner who is a co-owner of the home;
- veterans' discounts on medical care, education, and home loans; joint filing of tax returns;
- joint filing of customs claims when traveling;
- wrongful death benefits for a surviving partner and children;
- bereavement or sick leave to care for a partner or child;
- decision-making power with respect to whether a deceased partner will be cremated or not and where to bury him or her;
- crime victims' recovery benefits;
- loss of consortium tort benefits;
- domestic violence protection orders;
- judicial protections and evidentiary immunity;
and more....

You'll notice that most of these are legal conveniences.

Nerd in Denial poses this excellent question: The questions is, is legal convenience a justifiable reasons to have the government strictly regulate marriage?

Yes and no. The legal convenience is there specifically for the tax benefit and everything else stated above. Never in the history of marriage will you ever find as many 'legal conveniences' available for those who are married, specifically in the United States, one of the most powerful nation the world has ever seen. Is this still a justifiable reason to have the government strictly regulate marriage? No, however, take a close at the benefits above. Think about it; those are quite amazing benefits to have. No wonder there is a push from the gay/lesbian community to push for the legalization of same-sex marriage. Who wouldn't want those benefits? 

Now, we must ask ourselves, should marriage go back as a religious ordinance? Marriage should just be a mutual agreement/relationship established between a woman and one or more other persons that should be recognized by religion, social obligations, or ceremony. Then yes, marriage should go back as a religious ordinance. However, what should be is not realistic. If the government decided not to regulate marriage, taking a hand-off approach, which included taking away the benefits as stated above, Americans will go on a murderous rampage until marriage is reinstated. 

And really, do you not want the government involved in marriage in the first place? Not even for the benefits...? 







You may also like

No comments:

If you want to include any links in the comments section, you must put it in HTML format. If you don't know how to do that, please refer to this site. HTML Links

I do not pre-moderate any comments and welcome all kinds of thoughts- supportive, dissenting, critical or otherwise.

I will not delete or censor comments unless they have content that:

is abusive
is off-topic
contains ad-hominem attacks
promotes hate of any kind
uses excessively foul language
is blatantly spam


All comments are filtered through spam filtering technology; the spam-filtering technology isn’t perfect and from time to time it flags legitimate emails (false positives).

If you find that your comment isn’t immediately showing up, it may have been erroneously flagged as spam. Please email me at youngthomsen(@)gmail(dot)com to follow up on the status of your comment if it hasn’t shown up after 24 hours and I will do my best to sort it out.